So they're looking about 10 years into the future for those estimates.
The CBO estimated that the original bill would have stripped 24 million people of their health coverage but would have cut the deficit by $151 billion over the next decade.
As for lower costs, the ANN cited the Congressional Budget Office report that "by 2026, average premiums for single policyholders in the nongroup market would be roughly 10 percent lower than under current law".
For individuals with pre-existing conditions, once you are in the system, every proposal that I've heard so far says you stay in the system. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has said he hopes that plan will be ready for a vote before the August recess. "But that's the goal".
The bill largely saves money for the federal government because $834 billion less would be spent on Medicaid through 2026, according to the report.
But the CBO report said the amendment would make it hard or impossible for people in poor health to purchase comprehensive coverage in some states. While I certainly respect the work of the Congressional Budget Office and the staff there, it is important to remember how wildly inaccurate they have been on projections related to the Affordable Care Act: Their projections on enrollment in the ACA in 2016 were off by a staggering 12 million people - or 120%. In others, folks may not even be able to buy insurance because the market won't be viable. The savings-critical to the Republican's strategy to pass the bill in the Senate-are lower because waiver states would receive some funding to help customers who would be faced with higher costs. Schumer said the legislation would end up "causing costs to skyrocket, making coverage unaffordable for those with pre-existing conditions and many seniors, and kicking millions off of their health insurance".
Republican senators appear as determined as ever to replace the health law. That's what the analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office is called. But Trump's apparent self-fulfilling prophesy of the Obamacare "death spiral" is nihilistic, especially when the House GOP alternative would cut insurance for 23 million Americans. We had literally dozens of hearings, and the committee I was on in the Senate - the Health Committee - we accepted over 150 Republican amendments to the bill. Because of those policies' skimpy coverage, the CBO doesn't count those people as insured in this report. In all, 51 million people under the age of 65 would be without coverage by 2026, including those now uninsured. They would increasingly struggle to afford insurance, while insurance markets would become unstable within a few years.
"While I am in favour of repealing Obamacare, I am opposed to the American Health Care Act in its current form", Republican Senator Dean Heller said in a statement. You didn't really see any big policy changes.
"This assessment from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office proves that the bill passed by a party-line vote with no hearings will be unsafe and harmful". And do you think that this is going to be a surprise to them - a pleasant one, an unpleasant one?
"We have to stop this bill in the Senate", the email reads, hinting at the likely uphill battle the legislation will have in the upper chamber.
If that threshold had not been met, the House would have had to vote again on a new bill.
The report found that under the House measure, people in some regions with pre-existing medical conditions or the seriously ill "would ultimately be unable to purchase" robust coverage at premiums comparable to today's prices, "if they could purchase at all".
"Families get tax credits to make insurance cheaper".
But Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, a top House Republican who voted for the American Health Care Act earlier this month, said the report reinforces the GOP's "rescue mission" on health care.
Democrats have criticized Republicans for pushing people off coverage.
"Let me assure you they are using the House bill as a foundation for their negotiations", Murphy said.
The bill will force people to pay more for essential health benefits. Some states would allow companies to offer plans with fewer "essential benefits" which would result in lower premiums, but also less coverage.
Under current law, the CBO wrote, the markets will be "stable in most areas" because lower-income Americans buying individual insurance will be shielded from rising Obamacare premiums, thanks to subsidies.